From a risk perspective, a 5% premium to lock in a 'bird in the hand,' versus 'two in the bush' totally understandable. And from a truly long term investor perspective will be a roundig error.
But one of the main reasons I've always stuck with BCI & management has been (more than marketing) they've let existing shareholders participate in any raising & haven't scaled back in past (but haven't had massive oversubscriptions in past from my memory). And this ethos would also wear well with Australian Super, and wouldn't suprise me being a reason they've got on board.
Ann: Successful Institutional Equity Raising, page-17
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 52 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BCI (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
22.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $648.9M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 22.0¢ | 22.8¢ | 22.0¢ | $13.51K | 60.20K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 156783 | 22.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 22.5¢ | 1518 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 21/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BCI (ASX) Chart |