I actually don't believe that people think we have an open ended licence agreement for anything that can be produced using the OHD process... point in reference, GP's announcement actually only stipulates Bio Stimulants but unless we could actually see the licence itself we will have to just agree to disagree.
http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20170512/pdf/43j6pvvqh9tdhg.pdf
To further support why I think it is only for the bio stimulant and not what ever can be produced are:
Assuming that the 4th unit would be required to make the platform chemicals, then how on earth could Thermaquatica grant a licence for something they don't hold the patent to as yet?
As well as granting a licence for something not proven either?
quote:
Interestingly Thermaquatica have a patent pending for unit op 4 and this may well be the cause of the delay. AIMO DB
post:26805201
As the world's major car manufacturers move to cease production of ICE's, and move toward clean energies re: electric vehicles etc, why would GPP want to make a Bio Diesel, would we have a market for it?
Assuming
1: We actually had a plant
2: That plant had the required added on modules to make it (and proven)
quote:
I wonder how much a litre GPP can produce bio diesel for? Has anyone done any research around this? TIA DB
post:26811795
Just FYI
The same announcement did also say that the granting of the licence was key to the finalising of the PFS which is now the Commercial Plan, pfffffft.
PS: These questions will be added to the list when GPP management can get around to answering my email.
cheers
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
