I have been thinking about all these miscommunications led by...

I have been thinking about all these miscommunications led by the CEO and potential misleading statements and I looked at the Results announcement again,

“ The latest U.K. test results confirm that Path-Away® in Natshield™ has an efficacy of at 4.17Log (99.99% efficacy) within a minute against the feline coronavirus (surrogate of Covid-19) when tested at a concentration of 3%. This means that 99.99% of the virus is killed within a minute of exposure to Natshield™ ”

So looking at the language, it was Path-Away ingredient that is in Natshield that was tested not the final product Natshield. Then they go on to say “ This means that 99.99% of the virus is killed within a minute of exposure to Natshield™ “

So is that their interpretation? Should they not have had the final product Natshield tested before making such a statement in the announcement? In my opinion they have clearly made an assumption in the announcement without testing the final product.

Or am I just going insane jumping at shadows?