To me it looks like the EM plates modelled from the surface...

To me it looks like the EM plates modelled from the surface survey are iron sulphide-rich banded Iron Formation which was always a strong probability given the previous drilling showed BIF at about the right depths. But this needed to be tested because they could have been massive nickel or copper sulphides. Also there are plenty of BIF-hosted gold deposits so who knows what the assays might deliver with from this material.

Specifically to the DHEM. They drilled DD001, stuck a probe down there that scans out sideways and found another conductive plate, but they don't give a depth. I'd say its sufficiently "off-bottom" to warrant being seen as a separate conductor to the one that DD001 tested. So its either a slab of iron sulphides or a slab of nickel sulphides, or a mixture of both. But it seems its something new to investigate.

Adding a 4th drill hole to the program is good. If MAN knew what it was they wouldn't waste time drilling it. And there's nothing to say the drilling program wont be further extended. We're not restricted by access issues or cropping.

Finally, for all the "what-abouters" it pointless comparing this with Julimar and CHN, because if you do and say anything about Julimar that doesn't fit the narrative its a bit like you're questioning the Divinity of the Boy King. Newleyine is Newleyine, Julimar is Julimar. Want Julimar, buy some CHN shares.