Share
7,192 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 448
clock Created with Sketch.
01/11/17
17:32
Share
Originally posted by Investor50
↑
Your points about FFT are valid but I would like to add some further thinking if I may. Maxsec and FFT are both finding it hard to be successful because of their small size. Notwithstanding your very valid concerns about FFT, which I agree with, I have some concerns about Maxsec as well. The Ava business looks nice, but Maxsec shareholders only get 68% of the Ava profits, as the operatives in the Ava business enjoy a shared bonus pool of 32% of the profit. In other words, when Ava starts making money we the shareholders will only see 68% flow to the bottom line. Also, the BQT access business has struggled to get traction for 10+ years of operation, and is a drag on the current Maxsec business.
The benefits of a merger (I wont reiterate the benefits as that has already been covered) will give the combined Maxsec/FFT company a much better chance to operate successfully in what is a very competitive global marketplace. As a shareholder of both companies, I feel the merger deal is reasonable and that the value for both groups of shareholders will improve as a result. IMHO
Expand
" Maxsec and FFT are both finding it hard to be successful because of their small size"
BQT and FFT are finding it hard, AVA is not! This, yet again, is what is the problem in this deal.