invrstor 50 every thing you say is post transaction ...hooray...

invrstor 50 every thing you say is post transaction ...hooray for you in your white board theory but you sound like the FFT board who will throw up an idea to cover up bad results. Investor 50 it really is ok to hold your view and want more for your shares that you own in MSP, (unless your percentage in FFT is greater).

The actual transaction needs to be done first. That means convincing peoples minds and peoples pockets,

..........there are many objectors.......and the holders that will vote no because they
*flat out don't like the idea of the merged entity
*don't like the price but may vote yes later if the price was right
* don't like it because it doesn't pass the smell, sorry stink test. an unfair but reasonable offer that got accepted round one, by a spineless board who are actually smarter than the FFT board when measured against financial performance, recruitment sales growth , yet more stupid by the accepting offer first time, this is hard to fathom.

for the last time, you and EKO can philosophise about white horses and merged entities but
THE TRANSACTION IS YET TO BE DONE ..................... and it needs to be for a much higher and much firmer price,

I am sick of seeing the potential post transaction value of my shares fluctuate with such abandon. FFT should put up some cash. I would be more inclined with a cash and script offer... like 5 shares for 1, plus 0.6 (the sold called premium) in cash............I want my premium for the takeover paid in cash so it doesn't disappear if this transaction happens. MSP losses outweigh gains. We must lock in some wins