Hi Shortblack
I'm fairly certain that the PET shareholders would have to vote on whether their company invested in AKP or not. In addition, Fred and anyone else on the board (Newing for eg) would not be able to vote on the proposal since they have a substantial interest in AKP. However, this scenario at this stage remains solely a picture that you have in your head and has not been proposed. Hence, it is not a subject that deserves much debate any more than any other fanciful idea.
Now you've been active posting negative comments on this forum without any disclosed holding in AKP and also without any disclosed holding in PET. You've also asked posters here about their "morals." So I have a question for you -
Please let us know what, if any, listed company that you DO hold shares in. Then please also let us know if you think that it would be "morally" correct for holders of AKP to troll forums on that company when they hold no shares in it? That would be if they could also be bothered at all with something they have no interest in. Be careful though, because there are a lot of trolls on here and some of them might be tempted.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AKP
- Ann: Suspension from Official Quotation
Ann: Suspension from Official Quotation, page-159
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 290 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AKP (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$6.20 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $181.1M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some
AKP (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable