it just confuses me as to why the Carbine board would appear to...

it just confuses me as to why the Carbine board would appear to want to give away any part of a world class high purity/low impurity silica sand asset not granted under the current MLA , which by the way has been determined , using the shareholders investment cash over the past two years and pegged by the board as the most important portion of their only asset ........for nothing ...... thats right $0

i mean they must know these tenements cost money ...... they just bought an inferior silica sand resource tenement for the equivalent of $800,000 , so the company just paid to swap a great resource to get one thats worse than the one it had . ?????? this doesnt make sense there must be another reason

now thats not just a mistake by the board it's incompetence at a minimum and Carbine shareholders need to put a stop to this