there's something about the request for trading halt followed by a next day suspension for three weeks that wrangles with me and i can't resolve it. has anyone seen that approach before re: sale of a major asset? it is simple dd the purchaser is undertaking? if so why not just ask for a suspension, not trading halt? either is instantaneous. calima have a history of making imperfect announcements, and i wonder if there's an issue that's not harmonious between buyer and seller. just saying, obviously am hoping for a clean announcement in three weeks we're all ecststic about. been here a long time, hoping for the best...
Ann: Suspension from Quotation, page-57
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 56 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CE1 (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.9¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.700M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.9¢ | 0.9¢ | 0.8¢ | $84.38K | 9.591M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1361704 | 0.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0¢ | 7655300 | 6 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 02/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CE1 (ASX) Chart |