I think it's accumulation of the ban on Uranium Mining, them suing the government , the change of government , the planned overturn of the uranium mining ban and the change of Aura's management. They would of had to do a new feasibility study without Uranium included , but yes the deposit is valuable without Uranium and I remember they had a subsidiary company called Vandis Battery Metals AB which had plans for a manufacturing plant aswell.
Ann: Sweden initiates inquiry to overturn uranium mining ban, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 75 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
13.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $115.7M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 13.0¢ | 13.5¢ | 12.5¢ | $225.8K | 1.739M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | 522766 | 12.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 13.5¢ | 227128 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 13/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AEE (ASX) Chart |