I think it's accumulation of the ban on Uranium Mining, them suing the government , the change of government , the planned overturn of the uranium mining ban and the change of Aura's management. They would of had to do a new feasibility study without Uranium included , but yes the deposit is valuable without Uranium and I remember they had a subsidiary company called Vandis Battery Metals AB which had plans for a manufacturing plant aswell.
I think it's accumulation of the ban on Uranium Mining, them...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 75 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
16.5¢ |
Change
0.005(3.13%) |
Mkt cap ! $146.9M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 15.0¢ | 17.0¢ | 15.0¢ | $350.5K | 2.197M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13633 | 18.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 15.5¢ | 55707 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.59pm 18/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AEE (ASX) Chart |