That would be me Bill. Apologies for irritating you, but my...

That would be me Bill. Apologies for irritating you, but my reasoning wasn’t lame for not reading the report. If a publisher can’t take the time to get the basics correct, what confidence is there that they took the time to ensure the rest of the information, data, facts and analysis is correct? As a publisher of information, you should be fully aware of that. So while the rest of the information may have been correct making it a good report, I couldn’t rely on the accuracy of its contents. There is already too much misinformation that surrounds us. While you may disagree with me, the actual reasoning isn’t “lame”