Besides you seem the only one keeps comparing this and comparing...

Besides you seem the only one keeps comparing this and comparing that with other companies. And yet alpaka just said that "but better performance came when a smaller platelet size was tried." not the larger platelet size.

Do you understand that in addition to layers there is the symmetry and direction of the crystallites (turbostratigraphy), quantity and availability of bonding sites, or active edges, aspect ratio, oxygen content, holes, tears, edge shape, and any other number of other factors that decide usability of a graphene particle for a product. A single layer graphene may be actually be useless in some applications, even before considering its cost, while a multilayer product is fine and works. And this is before getting to functionalization of the graphene, and many other aspects of usability.

Those technical specifications are not necessarily to be announced. How efficient graphene works in a product is more important than what is written on a paper.