And yet again you have avoided two basic questions based on the...

And yet again you have avoided two basic questions based on the core logic of your groundbreaking statements, opportunities to back yourself up, instead you focus on digging up any other ammunition you can think of. I have responses to these new ones but I won’t even bother. Do not want to bore the audience some more.

I know where my verdict stands: solid GUILTY. I am sure the rest have seen enough to make up their minds.

And for Orson, for someone who I never had an interaction with feel so strongly against me to have me on Ignore is interesting. Touchy, aren’t we. Must be a disciple. Most probably called as reinforcements.

How can someone who simply summarises data from officially released figures an “upramper” is beyond me.

To the rest, first apologies for spamming the thread. I don’t usually do that. But I think I have achieved what I set out to do.