It's not the high watermark that is the issue, it's the six-monthly performance fee criteria. Performance fee should be based on increasing NAV, period. The investment manager should not be rewarded for a fluctuating NAV. This 'high watermark' is just jargon and evading the real issue. Not convinced.
It's not the high watermark that is the issue, it's the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add TEK (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
15.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $58.01M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 15.0¢ | 15.0¢ | 15.0¢ | $3.75K | 25K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 513007 | 14.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0¢ | 143146 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 18/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| TEK (ASX) Chart |