Lets look at the debt figure penn reports, debt never seems to go down it almost appears to b increasing..
Same costs,as posted penn carries on about being on target by reducing fixed costs by $2.5b which is basically just the transfer of tls techs to nbn but total costs seem to continue to increase.
As posted,maybe there r some lagging benefits.
But y does penn or chairman not say this.etc etc guidance etc.They say ebitda is going down with profit.
On a bright note i read a video on tls exchange re GR's ehealth,it sounds ok as in it they suggest covid is bringing forward ehealth and tls health explains specific areas they r involved in.ie an old example paperless prescription which imo is well over due.why should patients pay to see a gp whether bulk bill or private paid if they know all they r after is a prescription.?
And call me old fashioned,i liked it at the end of video when some one from tls said its a good 'business' as in tls health.I want more solid business talk and less la la climate change ,gender equally etc talk.
I want the chairman not to speak and for belong to get into reselling energy and ben burge b free to install home solar/battery units.Nothing brilliant about this just common sense.
ps lets not forget nas is a massive investment for tls,penn employed 1500 extra techs,on my maths at say $80,000 ea thats $120m extra cost and nas so far has not produced material profits including e health.
Ann: Telstra enters agreement to sell Clayton data centre, page-6
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?