(assuming there's no sarcasm there, and no personal slight )...

(assuming there's no sarcasm there, and no personal slight )

Maths should be be pretty straight forward..

Good question. I imagine it depends on the individual results.
"Results of the assays over the next 3 weeks" , one would assume,, which still need to be put in context, and assessed by management, and assembled into a coherent announcement, and signed off..

Perhaps if an individual result is looking 'bonanza' they may prioritize, and announce it prior to it leaking to market under disclosure requirements.
That could be sooner rather than later.

If its promising but reliant on the balance of results to give a bigger picture they may wait, assess in context, and include in a bigger picture ann.

I don't think you can be prescriptive nor request military precision ... there may be so many possible scenarios, and variables.

I would think any time up to one-two weeks(?) after receipt of complete assays if required.. You can do the sums.
Watching the kettle boil is not fun,, and I would like to see announcements asap obviously.. But that's not always practical, realistic, or possible.
I don't think it's helpful to state an exact timing for these.

I'm not a geo nor familiar with the intricacies of public disclosure and timing, so just IMHO.