In all fairness I do really respect the board and they've obviously done their analysis.
IMO Mt Carrington, with the current oil reserves and any gold price increase to go straight to margin, I wouldn't be suprised at all if the asset would produce WRM's current MC annually. Thats why I think the 71% is excessive.
I have been thinking about this, and realised my fault in calculating WRMs remaining 29% portion of ownership in terms of proportion of free cashflow, rather than total revenue. Nevertheless, I still feel like their should be something else to it.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WRM
- Ann: Term Sheet Signed to Progress Mt Carrington Gold & Silver
Ann: Term Sheet Signed to Progress Mt Carrington Gold & Silver, page-22
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)