Doesn't seem like they are much concerned with that, or they wouldn't be moving ahead with Avondale as well. Probably tried first with Fifield to ensure they indeed had a strong case, realised they did, and have gone ahead with the Avondale as well. With such an easy case, you won't need to rack up much in the way of costs to make an effective argument. They just point to the clause in the contract that was breached, the clear as can be evidence that the breach occurred, and then call it a day.
In the meantime, the drilling and rest of the business is moving along steadily. This is simply a bit of background action, but isn't actually weighing on anything business wise
Doesn't seem like they are much concerned with that, or they...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
