Nice to see progress but still some caveats before it gets exciting.
Results around C170 is not the same as meeting the C170 standard. In fact phrasing it that way infers they did not reach C170.
Why did they not do big enough samples for all the testing parameters? Seems like another dropped ball by this team.
And there is an undercurrent of questionable commitment from the Board on following through. I could be reading between the lines but it would have been nice if they had committed to the next step rather than discussing it.
I would love them to one day issue a statement that was not full of ambiguity but I am hopeful this keeps moving positively.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
