that's correct. No met work yet just some high level flake...

that's correct. No met work yet just some high level flake sizing.

fwiw you need more samples across the deposit to get a better understanding overall of the flake composition.

In my view some is good some is bad.
hole LEDD01 is not good. 10 micron is too small imho. once processes and spheronised will be too smal so yield will be awful.

LEDD02 is better but possible still a smidge on smaller size but will be closer the the mark. the last hole maybe average 50-80 micron before the flake size drops off a cliff at depth. this is probably the sweet spot.

what needs to occur and likely will in the future, is a LOM overall flake distribution across the deposit. then you can truly determine what areas will have the most amenable flake size and what ones won't.

Also flake size is 1 of half a dozen variables that impacts amenability for anode material. I think it's was too early to say or think it's suitable for anode material. once the concentration recovery and results land with the process flow sheet we'll have a better understanding. this combined with the overall flake distribution for the MRE is what's needed to be able to ascertain first principle economics and therefore viability.

SF2TH