I get why you’d slot my question into the ‘too hard’ box—there’s...

I get why you’d slot my question into the ‘too hard’ box—there’s definitely a tricky balance for management. If they hint at a fallback like leaning on Australia or cutting costs, it could spook some folks into thinking they’re not all-in on the U.S. push, especially with that 44% Amazon surge they’re banking on. I see the lose/lose vibe you’re picking up, and I’m with you on the optimism—kava’s got real potential stateside, now more than ever. Still, as investors, I think we’d both want a bit more than silence when risks come up. Instead of hiding the question, maybe they could’ve gone with a neutral nod—like, “We’re confident in the U.S. plan but have flexibility if needed”—keeping it vague but visible. That way, we’re in the loop without them overcommitting. What do you reckon—would that strike the right tone for us as shareholders?