One would hope late/delayed announcement of lab results is not a...

One would hope late/delayed announcement of lab results is not a reflection of sub-optimal results already/fully received but announcement held up while some fluff BS annoucement on another front is to be put out first to give maybe mates the chance to recoup profit from 0.1c CR.

This was just as thought and I hope it is wrong. No accusation intended here.

In having said that, these results being so vital and critical, if there is smell of fish, I would think it will be a significant consideration if the actions are reviewed.

P.S. Mr management, nodule where you pulled the 3 weeks figure out of in the quarterly, but a decent management would either not pluck figures out of where they shouldn't come from, or update to clarify delay.

Note, quarterly shold be a report of previous quarter. So, one could take the 3 weeks to start as of April 1st, yes, that may explaine it. Maybe management was trying to play April fools at on us. With ARE every day of last decade has been April fools day as far as treatment of shareholders is concerned, because everyday that the management has enjoyed their $salary with our shares losing value, the joke has been on us.