continue to defend the indefensibleDo you even believe what you...

continue to defend the indefensible

Do you even believe what you write?

You suggest that (a) any legal challenge is unsurmountable (which I believe is false) and (b) that your claim is truthful (it is not).

What you are asking forum readers to trust you on is:-

1. You are guaranteeing that Ed Husic will hold his preliminary view, ie he will not be persuaded by Advent's response.
2. You are guaranteeing that if the LNP win the next election, they would not overturn Husic's decision.
3. You are guaranteeing that if Advent was to contest Husic's decision in court, Advent could not win.

Here's a tip for you, you are lying, you can't even guarantee one of those three events let alone all three.

So it is actually you that is trying to defend the indefensible. Your thesis is flawed and you can't defend it.