TTT 0.00% 12.5¢ titomic limited

Ann: Titomic Aligns with Osaka Titanium Technologies & Marubeni, page-7

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 51 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 6
    Can any clever Hotcopperer answer this question - which has been troubling me for a while now: I remember Jeff Lang telling a roadshow conference a couple of months after listing that (loose quote here):"One of TKF’s advantages, though, is its ability to deal with irregular morphology powders, ones that don’t boast perfectly spherical particles, and cost closer to 50 USD per kilo. " It seems to me that TTT has been doing a lot of tie-ups with partners who produce highly specialised Ti powders (i.e.Osaka Titanium technologies & Marubeni just now and Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Sino-Euro Materials Technologies in December 2018) - my question is this: Why are we spending so much time and effort tying -up with specialised Ti powder producers when one of our main attractions is that the TKF process is not meant to need them? Is it in fact a case that we do need more expensive powders to use TKF in the majority of the envisaged additive manufacturing applications that we are investigating? I haven't asked the company this question yet but I'm hoping that one of you can answer my nagging worry?
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add TTT (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.