algy,You seem to have missed my point. I looked at TNG then and...

First 32 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
reddeer

1,109 Posts.

531

24/03/24

07:02

Post #: 73030053
Share

Originally posted by algy: ↑

Doubt all you want - your doubt doesn't change the facts of my holding. Not sure why you doubt how long I've been a holder when you've been a holder longer - didn't you have half a brain then? What an odd statement. If it helps to alleviate your doubt, I accrued most of my holding after Grant came on board.

Past management being less than ideal, and the company going nowhere under their stewardship, is not a reason to ignore poor performance of current management. This CR, the trading halt extension and suspension, was poorly handled (and dare I say it, reminiscent of past management - if PB had done this he would have (rightly) copped a sh*t storm), and everyone who has a stake in the company should be concerned by that. I don't recall going into a panic, or saying it would be the death knell of the company, but I, as a part-owner of the company, have a right to air my opinion. You don't have to agree with it, but denigrating me for my opinion is a reflection of the type of person you are, not me.

It seems there are many holders in this forum that take any criticism of the company as a threat to them (their intelligence?) or their holdings, and jump all over anyone offering a contrary opinion. That's a shame for everyone.

Expand

algy,
You seem to have missed my point. I looked at TNG then and it met my criteria for investing in a junior resource stock. The subsequent years in hindsight turned out to be fairy dust.
Grant's involvement, name change and makeover of Board and Management have saved the company(and our investment).
This is a sea change- you seem to be suggesting not much difference.
Hence my doubt about your bona fides.

TVN Price at posting: 5.9¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
8 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply