I think it's WHO Jo Gaines knows, not WHAT she knows, that's important.
Cutting out unnecessary hurdles to get this over the line.
I've been the poster boy, for 'lets get this #%&@ done' recently, but even I see the value in having Gaines WA contacts onboard.
100% agree with the rest though.
If I see the 'gang of four' off on another 'investment networking' foreign jolly-up at our expense, then I think quite a few shareholders will be asking very pointed questions.
It would be the end of this whole project if the ITE came back, with a raft of changes to make.
I can't see Prentice initiating this step without RCF being all over it, and making sure it was airtight.
I will say again though, that TMT are useless at building up interest in the stock.
The EPA chair coming onsite, and Jo Gaines to the board should have made the market take notice - no point issuing a tweet that has been viewed a grand total of 620 times. Or more of those staged 'interviews' on the same old platforms.
I'd honestly like to know why the 2 brokers recently engaged, aren't pumping TMT to retail very,very hard.
No point having positive momentum, if nobody knows about it.
Saying that, I'm more positive now, than I was a week ago.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?