Ann: TNG Submits Landmark EIS for Darwin Processing Site, page-51

Naimboy . The saying "never take things for granted", also applies to the AB's, its the fruit of complacency and complacency is the forerunner of disappointment. Anyway the best learning cerve is an embarrassing loss. There are no excused, the AB,s got sodded so hard even their wives are asking questions. The recovery and repare will be comprehensive.

Same applies to TNG, when they with GHD filed that woefully inadequate draft EIS for the Mt Peak Mine site. Cut corners, failed to read the lay of the land when it came to indiginous issues and water aquifer importance and got slammed for their arrogance. The embarrassment and need to repair the "brand" for which the BoD represent means the likelyhood is the draft EIS for the Darwin Refinery will be a work of art. I totally accept PB's assurances that they dont expect any drama, as a second cock up would be decimating.

On that front and accepting that im a technophobe when it come to the digi world, why does the TNG NOI filed with NT EPA by GHD in October 2015 come up as a pdf dated April 2019? It has niggled me for ages as all other docs have a date relevant to the day of filing. Anyone cure me of this niggling itch??