Maybe because of Brett's tone and allusions to good news...

Maybe because of Brett's tone and allusions to good news starting to flow during our phone conversation, as well as I'm inclined to assume it'll positive. I'm thinking a beneficial agreement or partnership for the trials because I think the improved terms of Panax were part of a bigger picture where someone is seeing mutual advantage to working with MGC.

There may be some limit to the influence of overseas studies on local policy, but it will add to the body of evidence even if Australian trials are still needed.