cmk You are absolutely correct - the first "technology"...

  1. 1,258 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 361
    cmk

    You are absolutely correct - the first "technology" announcement produced ONE product (so far). You are right in assuming that this latest announcement "in relation to the licensing of a second technology" might not even produce ANY products. I stand corrected. My point is, however, if the next "product", whether it uses the "first technology" or the "second technology" is as "successful" at producing revenue for OBJ then the company is in real trouble. As for the Market Cap "gibberish", how long do you expect the market to accept that OBJ will produce the revenues that reflect the current valuation of the company? Blind faith is all very well but it doesn't pay the wages bill. Disruptive technology has a limited lifespan before the next disrupter comes along and the clock is ticking.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.