How anyone could disagree with that logic baffles me.
When I first became aware of RWL and saw their list of acquisitions I was a little disturbed that they were actually privately held. Frankly, I was a little put off that a single entitity was treating waste water and selling it back to the public for profit and growing fat from the exercise. I always thought, since the liaison was announced, that RWL would become a key shareholder and that this would give the public, through shareholding of EMC, some access to RWL's revenue.
The merger is as good as it gets - RWL gets its listing and the whole will be greater than the sum of its parts.
One thing though - "fluence" is such a crap name. Surely the marketing gurus could have come up with something better than that? At least EMC had a faintly mathematical quality to it.
Maybe it's code (or is that coda (?) - "the concluding passage of a piece or movement") for a latterday theory of relativity? Effluence=Affluence !
I suppose its better than Soylent Brown.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- FLC
- Ann: Trading Halt
Ann: Trading Halt, page-72
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 62 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add FLC (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
9.6¢ |
Change
0.006(6.67%) |
Mkt cap ! $103.7M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
9.1¢ | 9.7¢ | 9.1¢ | $1.38K | 14.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 124999 | 9.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
10.0¢ | 11262 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 124999 | 0.091 |
1 | 99999 | 0.090 |
2 | 51176 | 0.085 |
1 | 43000 | 0.081 |
5 | 160890 | 0.080 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.100 | 11262 | 2 |
0.110 | 124214 | 2 |
0.115 | 150000 | 3 |
0.120 | 272053 | 4 |
0.125 | 50000 | 1 |
Last trade - 13.38pm 03/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
FLC (ASX) Chart |