Share
2,487 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 205
clock Created with Sketch. 10/12/17
19:41
Share
Originally posted by Taurean7
↑
At the risk of becoming boring, the point that I have been attempting to make Cracker is the distinction between fact and interpretation.My initial post referred to reported sales orders through 2016 that I believe are factual, and made the point that there is no evidence to see them as otherwise. we are virtually achieving what they said (in the Foundations document) ”. Rather I confirmed that what they said was not achieved within the stated timeframe. What I did say was that I believe around $18M of Sales was achieved by the end of 2016 and not $18M of Revenue (or Earnings ), which was the mistake made in drafting that predictive document. The difference between those two forms of income is a timing delay.don’t see a need for an announcement accompanying this CR ”. I definitely see a need for an announcement tomorrow. What I hope it will contain is some form of assurance that the Company has received definite indications from the sources shown in the term sheet that large sales contracts will soon eventuate as a result of the raising.
Expand
Your attempt at logical communication is admirable. But when I read comments from your correspondent like this....."I'm happy to wait another few years for decent SP appreciation if we know the truth......" well it's beyond logical response.
