Or it could just be that Big borrowed some money to cover the cost of its office equipment video storage etc and the GSA obligations are to repay the loan.
IMO Lots of speculation going on about what this means. Some posters painting a doomsday scenario (notably the posters who down ramped a week ago)
Furthermore we don’t know the detail of what was asked of Big in the ASX letter that resulted in TH. I’d be disappointed if BIG didn’t seek legal advice before responding.
Other JS claims today? Well a couple of dissatisfied customers. Few businesses operate without them.
Some issues about loan agreements and invoices. We don’t know what this is about or wether or not this is just one or two instances. Not that this would stop JS running another article trying to link these to the trading halt or the down rampers shouting conspiracy when they have no “facts” other than from JS.
KEEP CALM AND CARRY ON
All my own opinion
DYOR
Lumpy
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Trading Halt
Or it could just be that Big borrowed some money to cover the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 593 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)