If you want to criticise a company then base it in fact. Posters like you who get on here and don't contribute but actually make up scenarios that have no basis in reality do more harm than good.
Let's look at the statements you have made:
1.
You stated that you put a formal request together to enter the facility and then you accused the management of not being enthusiastic enough to reply to your email. This is a misleading statement. As refuted by Roby on Twitter when your post was put to him word for word. He said he didn't know who you were and that he had never seen any formal request to enter the facility. He went on to say that he is more than happy for anyone to enter the facility all they needed to do was contact them so they could organise a time.
2.
I don’t use twitter and I have emailed
,au twice but no response. If someone can help me out here it would be appreciated. I am in Slovenia from 13th to 16th July. So you want help! we point out the error in the email address with the comma and also give you a very clear and easy way to contact Roby directly. You refuse but continue to criticise the company.
3. Let me tell you that I am still not getting any response to my emails, not even the courteousy of a reply despite all the BS Roby is filling your head with on twitter about how pleased he would be to show investors around. There is no evidence you are even sending email. Roby stated it on twitter, not anonymously on hotcopper like you, he is accountable. I know for a fact through other social media forums which are not anonymous that he has shown Australian investors around facility. So this is basically a lie from you. But you continue to perpetuate this lie
4. I know that this may be a little hard for you to understand but its called common courteousy.
It’s not the reply but the lack of reply which is the issue here. It’s indicative of the attitude this company has towards its shareholders.
This is basically another lie. Every time I have contacted the company I have had a response. With concerns and criticisms I have had they not only responded to my email but asked that I call the company and speak to Brett Mitchell for clarification. So I find it impossible to believe that they are not responding to your email. Since we have tried to help you correctly send the email, the only reasonable conclusion is that you have not sent it and in fact are just trolling. Even if you don't want to use twitter why not call? I mean you stated clearly that you want a chat with Roby
5. More importantly I just want the chance to have a chat with Roby and his mates and get a bit of a feel about a number of things. I suspect I will get fobbed though.....prove me wrong Roby So again you criticise the company with a pathetic innuendo. It is totally unfair to criticise someone for not contacting you when you haven't even contacted them. You are deliberately trying to sow doubt about Roby on this forum. How can he fob you if you haven't even used any means of communicating with him.
To @gutmike I understand your sentiment but I think you need to be a realist here. Not everyone on these forums are here with good solid intentions. There are posters who are here to downramp and troll companies as there are those who upramp. Both can do a lot of damage to the uninitiated. So they should be called out. It is clear pnh88 is not being reasonable to the company and is playing a childish game. I am going to call posters like them out. Otherwise these forums get hijacked and become worthless.
Don't get me wrong I hope the same is done on me. I am bullish on this company and when I post provide it with evidence. If I don't happy to get called on it. But you read through this post and tell me that pnh88 behaviour is fair and reasonable towards the company.
(20min delay)