Inspections happen all the time and are never reported - what's the big deal?
IMHO, the regulator should deliver a warning then give adequate time for rehab requirements to be implemented, then return for a follow up site visit before taking a decision to suspend or otherwise - factoring in any mitigation.
We live in country with a judiciary that operates on fair principles and due process, not a kangaroo court system.
It stinks the regulator chooses to suspend a couple of days before Xmas - why not issue notice of intent for follow up site visit in NY then re-assess. Surely the regulator will be off for the next two weeks regardless.
Why waste neurons trying to create a hurricane when this is merely a storm in a tea cup?!?
Ann: Trading Halt, page-51
Add CCZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.497M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 2631274 | 0.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.6¢ | 3256250 | 8 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 02/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CCZ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable