Ann: Trading Halt, page-158

With no financial context to your comment, the Sister Act reference does not engage the question of the $40m EBITDA for each of the years since the business fell into difficulty.

I find it difficult these days to argue against "words for word's sake", instead of "facts for argument's sake".

There is no question the business in the future will be smaller. The real issue is whether it will be profitable. In my view, with the bulk of the debt burden gone, management will be in a position to make smarter business decisions in the interests of ALL stakeholders.