The primary judge was correct at [16] to conclude that “[o]n the proper construction of the Deed, New Hope and the Part 1(2) Entities [i.e. the first to ninth respondents to the appeals] have not guaranteed the obligations of the Part 1(3) Entities”. The appeal should be dismissed.
Proposed ordersForthe foregoing reasons I propose the following orders1) In theWICET proceedings 2019/259457
as can been seen from the judgement of the NSW Court of Appeal , NHC has another win.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$4.16 |
Change
0.100(2.46%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.516B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $4.06 | $4.17 | $4.03 | $11.48M | 2.806M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 5024 | $4.15 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $4.16 | 30838 | 6 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.19pm 21/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NHC (ASX) Chart |