Y4ukikmycow you claimed the recoveries were only 60%When faced...

Y4ukikmycow you claimed the recoveries were only 60%
When faced with the company's own commentary that recoveries were 85-90% you claimed to know better and suggested people should listen to you and let the experienced ones deal in facts. You've made claim recoveries are much worse than they are and hint you know more than Terry and co and are dealing in facts. When asked to name your source and their testing methods you can't.

You obviously dont know the first thing about stock markets either. Last traded price was 0.4c. Meaning it is illegal to do a raise at 0.2c as it is a 50% discount. Even 0.3c is a 25% discount and they would need to seek approval for that.

So you've been wrong twice today already. Incorrectly defaming the company saying their recoveries are only 60% and calling for a 0.2c raise.

The more you post the less credible you become. Back up your claim of the 60% recovery or you've outed yourself as posting opinion as fact.

You do this a lot actually. Like claiming Terry Streeter only involvement in WSA was putting in $10K of seed. What a load of rubbish.

Anyone with google can search "CZN recovery rate" and in 2 seconds see you are lying. Likewise "WSA Terry Streeter discovery history".

Everyone can't wait for your next essay length post that contains zero facts.