That’s one option (preferably!).
Another option is the original angled (and at times wet) AC has smeared two narrower, parallel zones of mineralisation down the holes, exaggerating the interpreted width materially (Section A), And/or Section B is limited only to Supergene.
In the above scenarios, RC could have shown the alteration to be materially narrower on Section A and nothing at depth on Section B based only off the RC chips.
That’s one option (preferably!).Another option is the original...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 34 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add DEG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.21 |
Change
-0.005(0.41%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.887B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.22 | $1.22 | $1.19 | $7.046M | 5.872M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 29087 | $1.20 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.21 | 79225 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 15/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| DEG (ASX) Chart |