Ann: Trading Halt, page-334

RAP seem incapable of getting involved where there is a genuine opportunity...they have been weighed measured and spat out like old gum by Sanofi and Roche and their mates at FDA...simple as that. Focussed on the wrong thing/s at the wrong time and now? What makes you think they are capable of better going forward...they have shown their true worth. No China deals after months of visits, no Europe deals after years of connection and no Ozzie deals. Forget the USA they have dumped the dirt of a grteat tech cause the RAP tream got sucked in to the Yankee "old mates look after each other vortex". Now we sit and we wait (again and again) on some vague notion that maybe Cpoivu are going to do something with RAP. Whos says this is across the line? If they delay or worse still dump RAP then SP back to 3.5 c IMHO. DYOR this is about as silly as it gets and actually nearly funny. Not even an announcement like..."after some recent communications with the FDA it has been decided to advance discussions twixt RAP and FDA so a meeting to fast track the resolution of the benefits vs safety concerns the FDA have can be resolved in a timely manner . Meeting expected within 4 weeks at a date to ba advised".
That sort of action is required...Experion should be able to swing this type of fast forward type approach in light of the fact someone has taken their eye off the ball at a critical time.
Try this...On Rap test $5. % RAP tests $15 (one per day per person). The person using the cough app does one test and gets 86% negative for lower respiratort tract. Is FDA saying that this is where the danger lies? If so what if they get the same diagnosis for three tests (one per day over 3 days)?. This would then point to maybe a 95% chance of being correct thus lowering the "danger" from an incorrect diagnosis to very low probability levels yes? Then iif the patient got 5 out of 5 negatives over 5 days it would just about put the issue beyond doubt as would a 4 out of 5 count.
One wonders why on earth RAP would not have included this sort of data in their official testing for their official trials. Sheesh! There is no strategic plan that accounts for all possibilities. Where has Experion been? They were the dudes. I suppose they only had the resuts that RAP had gained to work with. This is tragic. The above scenario of multiple tests over several days takes away the "danger" the FDA are "concerned" (falslely?) about.
one test OK should be good but...now 3 tests just about gives a lock down but do 5 tests over 5 days and get a 4 or 5 from 5 result does away with a possible false reading past the FDA "danger" point yes? Why oh why wasn't this incorporated intop the RAP evidence and proof of efficacy and and accuracy claims? Don't think I cabn stand much more. TK is in charge...the pothers are monkeys but who devvised the criteria for these trials knowing the level of opposition that could be forthvcominng. Also the accuracy would have shioved us into the fray straight away as a triaging tool that would unclog the Corona testing muddle that currently exists. The train left the staion and we weren't on it! One test $5...5 tests $15 per person not transferable. Out of tragedy comes clarity...is it too late?