Ann: Trading Halt, page-141

It doesn't matter how reasoned or well thought out any counter-arguments are with some because they are bad faith 'participants'. I put participants in quote marks because it snot about engagement in genuine discussion its about ranting and using the weakest of weak *** arguments. That's been proven time and time again. A genuine contrarian is in control of their arguments and they have substance. Another poster has laid out why the deals on offer were rejected by the company and the company's thinking behind the capital raise but that doesn't suit certain narratives or agendas. If the starting point is that the company is always lying what chance id there of having a reasonable discussion?