In fact, Vango already released a press statement, describing the steps taken with regard to the MANDATORY INJUNCTION the judge ordered, due to Vango's 2017 breach. For whoever keeps abusing the moderation system, HERE'S THE SUBSTANTIATION including link to Vango's press release:
"The terms of the mandatory injunction required Vango to issue two specifically formulated offers to Billabong by 14 February 2022 and for Billabong to decide whether it wished to accept one of the offers by no later than 11 March 2022."
Note the judge also made Vango pay 80% of Superior's court costs.
Superior is appealing the judge's ruling that no injunctive relief will result from Vango's 2016 breach.
So, plainly - and contrary to RockShell's repeated assertions - that's EXACTLY how it works. The injunctive relief due from the 2017 breach remains in place, even though Superior is appealing the part of the ruling having to do with the 2016 breach.
Finally, note the judge ruled that Vango breached contracts it had made, both in 2017 and in 2016. The only reason injunctive relief was not awarded for Vango's 2016 breach was that Northern Star owned the Ore Treatment Agreement, in 2016, and choses of action are not usually passed through ownership changes. And Zuleika is suing Vango as well.
