Any single holding 5% or more is classified as a SUBSTANTIAL HOLDING but the issue you would have is arguing that a collective holding should be classified as the same so it would need to be a class action.
Additionally you would have the risk of CN's being redeemed and the holding percentage impacted making the whole process prone to risk of being irrelevant IMO
CLZ never fails to entertain!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CLZ
- Ann: Trading Halt
Ann: Trading Halt, page-62
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 46 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CLZ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.544M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
CLZ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable