Why would you be privy to the agreed statements of facts? The...

Why would you be privy to the agreed statements of facts? The Court has not yet published the ruling on those submissions.

Why would the Court sanction him so heavily if he did nothing wrong? Clearly the court agrees he did something wrong so there is nothing defamatory about anyone here stating he did so when that is the truth the court, the Doc, ASIC and the market as a whole have accepted. Have a look a the share price. You don't get to that point by doing things right.

And don't compare it to ZNO, that's a different story altogether. HCT had diversified products and was trading over the 5c mark before COVID even existed. It sunk to the current levels because nobody wants to risk dealing with or investing in a company that can be wiped out by a Judges decision in one fell swoop. His role was to not bring that misery and uncertainty to the company. His role was to act in accordance with the law and not open the company up to prosecution by the regulator - ASIC. He did not do that. It's in front of you as clear as day and has been for almost two years. Now we have to see if the damage can be undone.