It’s a bit sad that this spruikers drivel is what you fall back on when confronted with home truths. The idea that you may be affiliated or directly related to the case is far from fanciful to anyone still reading this board. But let me spell out the facts and situation:
-The idea that there are actual supporters of GPR among RIM shareholders is absurd-assuming I am correct they are not a listed entity, but a privately owned entity with a handful (if that) of beneficial owners?
-No independent shareholder who cares about their investment would support a company/individuals willing to trash the share price (let alone support someone dragging their own personal ownership battles which the court said laid no blame on RIM)
-No independent shareholder would talk approvingly of trying to damage RIM by endless litigation (and tellingly allusions that it will continue beyond arbitration - how do you know that?)
-Share prices hate uncertainty, that driven by GPR and supported by trolls here.
I could go on, but the conclusion speaks for itself.
RIM Price at posting:
2.4¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)