so you think big volumes asap ex Africa...to keep non-china...

so you think big volumes asap ex Africa...to keep non-china battery assembly lines RUNNING
and asap put Hazer into sewage plant in big city so can say something like contains “recycled” graphite carbon... or word it that it’s ECO-FRIENDLY carbon that has reduced very harmful methane emissions possibility of getting into atmosphere & affecting Ozone Hole!
BUY this SK ethical product with no concern about origin of chinese sourced graphite... Marketing might LOVE that.
As increase Hazer supply can cost effectively swap out or lower the % of virgin material in a battery pack.
This makes HAZER “synthetic” ethical vs Chinese unknowns?
Blended logically tries to keep unit cost sensible rather than dearer than in past.

The correct disclosure would be HAZER placed another production order to be fabricated in Italy & sounds like you think the modules might go to POSCO asap. Would be nice to see a catastrophe trigger some innovation (adopted years after Hazer had it available imo). smells like if market is going to absorb a price change as China’s Communists ENTIRELY decouple trade from Democracies incl USA then factor this into modern costings as EU already mandates “recycling” and anti-pollution.

Does methane emissions reduction get any LGC type income stream (meaning a government supervised system)?
On the one hand methane has value, so you suspect INDUSTRY wants to capture and use...on the other cost vs using virgin energy - traditional electricity sources. ultimately 20x benefit of not emit methane... but ALSO this is energy not emitting CARBON DIOXIDE.

Is it the CONSUMER eg company running a hydrogen turbine to make RE into Grid that gets the LGC “downstream” from Hazer process selling its output streams. Hazer hydrogen sells at a price (higher) that includes the fact that using that dear product results in a LGC - worth about $18/MW (per 1 LGC) as FIXED price 2025... seems insufficient to be financially viable?