I am only commenting on what Hopper does. When it is a good news, why should I rubbish that? And when it's bad, why should I praise him for that? I invest in many comps but there aren't any like the Hopper's where the chairman constantly undermines the clinical staff's work and success. Hence, great clinical update - Steini writes " Well done! ". Halving the company value based on a good anns, Steini writes " What an idiot! ". Had he raised at 1c I would have congratulated him for finally showing some courage and Team support.
Again, it is Hopper who makes decisions I can only comment on the way I see it. And as I am not alone with my views you can't just put them away as Tantrum, Meltdown, Steini you need help ... and so on.
The fact is, the sp will most likely fall down to 0.4c and there were plenty of opportunities to have avoided that. And as he continues the same way as he did the outcome is easy to predict. I bought a few at 0.8c as the fundamentals here aren't valued at all and at some stage the market might change that. And as neither you nor I know when that would happen, therefore I took a punt like most would do. Not too much, already considered and hoped for more to buy at 0.7c and 0.6c if the MAN wouldn't have changed the script again. Of course, you could argue that Hopper provided me and others with an even cheaper top up - "Hey Steini, be happy to get them for 0.5c or less!" but that bargain now would most likely turn into a very expensive buy.
Marketing means: Reacting to the ever-changing market, and when people like Hopper change direction every 5 minutes then I have to do the same.
Simple, not rocket science.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
