2.8 Mil of the job keeper was paid back in the same period. So...

2.8 Mil of the job keeper was paid back in the same period. So net benefit in cash flow wasn't 6mil

There was also over 6.6 Mil in IPO costs last year that wont happen again.

Re the lease payments I don't think this is lease payments made for the year, it has doubled since the year before as below. Which doesn't make sense:


Reading their accounting policy I think they are recognizing future costs of new leases that are signed during the year possibly. Its a little hard to understand. I think a lot of the NPAT an EBIT numbers given excluding job keeper are more relevant.