Share
4,384 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1209
clock Created with Sketch.
18/11/23
13:35
Share
Originally posted by Drum in sync:
↑
Great post and like you I am against the current offer but not against a sensible offer I was very disappointed with the tone of that announcement and the threat of naming those who oppose the current deal...what is this are we now losing our rights as shareholders to voice a view that opposes RCF's and the current board TMT can still be a viable mining operation without AVL but it is unlikely AVL could ever mine without TMT's assests so you are correct in why AVL holders are so "cocky" with the current offer Hold tight next 3 months will be very interesting
Expand
bit hard to single out any one person when 22 holders intent to vote NO and then more to come. When the top 100 holders hold 75% of TMT it a bit hard to say TMT holders have been threatened. I think TMT holders are saying get lost AVL base on the fact they there project doesn’t stack up. This guy on twitter obviously has a point!https://x.com/weberqmr/status/1725457250784063956?s=46&t=lyfOQOuurialam9_ndoS3w