I recently ran a campaign to remove two Directors from a small Canadian oiler where the Australian based execs were/are underhanded in their dealings with self interest clearly putting their own interests before shareholders.....there's a whiff of that here. Many people on HC were incensed....It takes a lot of time, money & energy. In the end it was akin to herding cats. I chucked it in. Was spent.
Threats to Directors often go unheeded unless it comes with the backing of at least 5% of the Register for a 249D. Here, the Directors seemingly are onboard and no wonder considering the remuneration structure for supporting the transaction.
The ASX and ASIC are useless unless there's a clear breach and even then it's slow & tedious. You need criminality. That's not what's being served here....it's arguably dirty & blatantly unfair I think but that doesn't cut intervention from regulatory oversight bodies. Even the largest shareholder has indicated its backing. It's going to happen even if it's distasteful. And it is.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Transformational Acquisition Gold-Cobalt Development Project
I recently ran a campaign to remove two Directors from a small...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add DCX (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $66.1K |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
DCX (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online